Cases 31 - 40 of 84
LIGHTHOUSE BAPTIST CHURCH OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, INCORPORATED v. SHORES
as 4:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
LIGHTHOUSE BAPTIST CHURCH OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
RICKY SHORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowell v. Myers et al(INMATE 3)
as 3:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Andy C. Nowell
Defendant:
Muscogee County Georgia, Columbus Georgia, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 4:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JENKINS
Defendant:
COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA and ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clay v. Muscogee County, City of Columbus, Georgia
as 1:2017cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
Muscogee County, City of Columbus, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Idahosa v. City of Columbus, Georgia, et al
as 17-12169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT IDAHOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD BOREN, Police Chief and others
SMITH v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA
as 4:2017cv00094
Petitioner:
NAKEEYTA DENISE SMITH
Respondent:
COLUMBUS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Russell v. John Darr, et al
as 17-11660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DARR, ANTHONY ERMI, Deputy, JUAN A. MERRITT, Deputy and others
HARRIS KING et al v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HARRIS KING and KEIONA WRIGHT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA , MICHAEL CIELINSKI and TERRI EZELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
