Cases 31 - 40 of 53
South Bend City of v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
South Bend City of
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, South Bend Common Council , Tim Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Federal Wire Tap Act
Norwood v. Mason
as 12-2506
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Clyde J. Norwood, JNR
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Mark Mason, Officer
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy Police Department, Troy, New York, Mayor, Troy, New York and Common Council, Troy, New York
Holland v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary City of, Scott King, Hamilton Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fertel-Rust, Mary v. City of Milwaukee Police Dept. et al
as 3:2011cv00784
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Koegel Fertel-Rust
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee Police Dept., City of Milwaukee, Wis., City of Milwaukee Central Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carriere v. Bradley
as 11-4592
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carriere, individually, and as President of the Professional Fire Fighters Association, Inc., Local 274, I.A.F.F.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Carrier, individually, and as President of the Professional Fire Fighters Association, Inc., Local 274, I.A.F.F., Duncan MacRae, individually and as President of the White Plains Retired Uniformed Fire Fighters Association, Edward Monk, individually and on behalf of certain other Retired Employees of the City of White Plains, formerly in the PFFA Bargaining Unit and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Adam Bradley, as Mayor of the City of White Plains, Thomas M. Roach, constituting the Common Council of the City of White Plains, Benjamin Boykin, II, constituting the Common Council of the City of White Plains and others
Fertel-Rust, Mary v. UWM Golda Meir Library et al
as 3:2011cv00430
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Koegel Fertel-Rust
Defendant:
UWM Golda Meir Library, Eva Barlzak, Security Guard Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abramowitz v. City of White Plain
as 11-598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Arne Abramowitz, on behalf of themselves as Retired Managerial/Confidential, Appointed and Elected Officials of the City Of White Plains, Samuel W. Bartholomew, Jr., on behalf of themselves as Retired Managerial/Confidential, Appointed And Elected Officials of the City Of WhitePlains, Charles Bradley, on behalf of themselves as Retired Managerial/Confidential, Appointed And Elected Officials of the City Of Whiteplains and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of White Plains, Adam T. Bradley, In his office as Mayor of the City Of White Plains, County of Westchester, State Of New York, John Callahan, In his official capacity as Chief of Staff/Corporation Counsel Of The City Of White Plains, County Of Westchester, State Of New York and others
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. City of Adams et al
as 3:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
City of Adams and Common Council of the City of Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERDT v. CIVIL CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2010cv00140
Defendant:
THE CIVIL CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, THE COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, KEITH FETZ and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE HERDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carrier v. Bradley
as 10-4400
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Joseph Carrier, individually, and as President of the Professional Fire Fighters Association, Inc., Local 274, I.A.F.F., Duncan MacRae, individually and as President of the White Plains Retired Uniformed Fire Fighters Association, Edward Monk, individually and on behalf of certain other Retired Employees of the City of White Plains, formerly in the PFFA Bargaining Unit and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Adam Bradley, as Mayor of the City of White Plains, Thomas M. Roach, constituting the Common Council of the City of White Plains, Benjamin Boykin, II, constituting the Common Council of the City of White Plains and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
