Cases 31 - 40 of 224
CONWAY et al v. METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01373
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE CONWAY and PATRICK CONWAY
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farlow v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00349
Plaintiff:
Hashim Kareem Farlow
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and B. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONWAY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00535
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
HARVEY CONWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolentino v. Xve et al
as 3:2019cv01363
Defendant:
Mrs. P Price, Mr. Cousins, Ms. Baldauf and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tolentino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Material Witne:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GILBERT v. DIPLOMAT PROPERTY MGR LLC et al
as 5:2019cv02986
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A. GILBERT
Defendant:
DIPLOMAT PROPERTY MGR LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, FAY SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1421
Conway v. RGS Financial, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01163
Plaintiff:
Mary Conway
Defendant:
RGS Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
CONWAY v. TD BANK
as 2:2019cv02722
Defendant:
TD BANK
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. CONWAY, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv02297
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBIN L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
