Cases 31 - 40 of 130
FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 3:2017md02779
Plaintiff:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET, COUNTY OF HUDSON, RANNEY SCHOOL and others
Defendant:
FIELDTURF USA, INC., FIELDTURF, INC., TARKETT INC. and others
In Re:
FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SUAREZ v. CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Defendant:
UNION CITY POST OFFICE , CITY OF UNION CITY, COUNTY OF HUDSON and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOTA J SUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MURRAY et al v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2017cv02875
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MURRAY , PATRICIA AIKEN and EDPDLAW, LTD.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 2:2017cv02624
Plaintiff:
VANDYKE JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROSE DUNCAN, JOSEPH CHARLES, JR., BENJAMIN BERNOUY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1806
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1805
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HUDSON v. FIELDTURF USA, INC et al
as 2:2017cv01628
Defendant:
FIELDTURF USA, INC, FIELDTURF, INC. and FIELDTURF TARKETT SAS
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
DILLS v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2017cv01505
Plaintiff:
TYESHA DILLS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL, RONALD EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
