Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Padilla v. Texas Prison System et al
as 3:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Prison System, University of Texas, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Torres v. Adult Probation et al
as 3:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Anthony Torres
Defendant:
Office of Adult Probation, Office of the Chief Court Administrator and Nicole Grella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Danbury Superior Court, et al
as 3:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Tod M. Sparks, II
Defendant:
Judges/Clerks/Police and Danbury Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Bishop et al
as 3:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Stewart
Defendant:
Renee E. Bishop, Deutsche National Bank Trust, PHH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hines et al v. McShane et al
as 3:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shimeke Hines and Cathy Hines
Defendant:
Peter McShane, Moses, Superior Court House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Superior Court House et al
as 3:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines, Telly Hines and others
Defendant:
Superior Court House, Nichole Feinburg, Caroline Wetson and others
Hines v. Jail Diversionary Program et al
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Medical Prescribers, Bridgeport Hospital, Court Marshals and others
Roundtree v. Hartford Courant et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant:
Hartford Courant, Telemundonevainglaterra.com, Dailyadvent.com and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
