Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Hunter v. Watkins et al
as 3:2014cv01894
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hunter
Defendant:
Craig Watkins and O Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Watkins et al
as 3:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hunter
Defendant:
Craig Watkins, Dallas Police Department and M James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Watkins et al
as 3:2014cv01536
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hunter
Defendant:
Craig Watkins, O Hampton, Gary Fitzsimmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Lakey et al
as 1:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
Abortion Advantage, Austin Woman's Health Center, Lendol L. Davis, M.D. and others
Defendant:
David Escamilla, Jaime Esparza, Rene Guerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Manos v. Hawk et al
as 3:2014cv01128
Plaintiff:
Michael Manos
Defendant:
Susan Hawk , Terri Moore, M. Sauter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crain v. Dallas County Sheriff et al
as 3:2014cv00920
Petitioner:
Rubin Crain, IV
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff, Craig Watkins and L Valdiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manos v. Hawk et al
as 1:2014cv01449
Defendant:
Jennifer Balido, Susan Hawk, Terri Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Manos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Gruenfelder v. April Smith, et al
as 14-10204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GRUENFELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
APRIL SMITH, Court Investigator, Dallas County Courts, SUSAN HAWK, 291st District Judge, Dallas County Courts and CRAIG WATKINS, District Attorney
Williamsv. Watkins et al
as 3:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Charles A Williams
Defendant:
Craig Watkins, George E Ashford, III, Robert Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. Watkins
as 3:2013cv04803
Plaintiff:
Richard Richard
Defendant:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
