Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
CRISP v. USA
as 1:2012cv00106
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: PATRICK LEROY CRISP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crisp v. Walker
as 5:2011ct03147
Plaintiff: Taurice M. Crisp
Defendant: Alvin Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISP v. KELLY
as 1:2010cv00701
Petitioner: TAURICE MARQUESE CRISP
Respondent: ALVIN K. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff: Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant: City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRISP v. WALKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00155
Petitioner: TAURICE MARQUESE CRISP
Respondent: ALVIN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crisp et al v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv00429
Plaintiff: Roy Franklin Crisp and Betty Jean Crisp
Defendant: A. W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amchem Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Crisp v. Walker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00096
Plaintiff: Taurice M. Crisp
Defendant: FNU Walker, Chuck LNU and Joyce LNU
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffelt v. Lovin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00038
Plaintiff: Mark Raymond Coffelt
Defendant: Kieth Lovin, Clifford Owl, Jr. and J. L. Crisp
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Crisp v. Beck
as 5:2009cv00037
Petitioner: Taurice M. Crisp
Respondent: Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crisp v. Keller et al
as 5:2009cv00033
Plaintiff: Taurice M. Crisp
Defendant: Alvin W. Keller and Boyd Bennett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?