Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Werdebach v. Ebert et al
as 1:2019cv01198
Plaintiff:
Tony Werdebach
Defendant:
Cumberland County District Attorney and M.L. Ebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALEXANDER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2019cv00947
Plaintiff:
John Alexander
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, Adam Huber, Gildea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Friel et al
as 1:2019cv00943
Defendant:
John Friel, Michael Halkias, Elizabeth Beckley and others
Plaintiff:
Weston Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv02306
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ADAM HUBER, LT. GILDEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appel v. Phillips et al
as 1:2019cv00788
Defendant:
Dodson, Cody Phillips, Michael Halkias and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv02286
Defendant:
City of Carlisle, Officer Kenndy, Officer Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Damion G. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv02286
Defendant:
City of Carlisle, Officer Kenndy, Officer Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Damion G. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Reitz et al
as 1:2018cv02102
Respondent:
Warden Earl Reitz and Cumberland County Prison
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh v. Cumberland County Prison et al
as 1:2018cv01622
Defendant:
Cumberland County Prison, Todd Deihl and Earl Reith
Plaintiff:
Gurinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 1:2018cv01468
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson and Melinda Ann Thorson
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Christopher Colondrillo, Earl F. Reitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
