Cases 31 - 40 of 41
York v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D York
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2013cv01462
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis , Duane P. Ford , Cynthia E. Ford and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robert Chacon v. J. Patton, et al
as 13-20052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHACON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. PATTON, Sergeant, Z. MOORE, Sergeant, AMOS YORK, SR., as Successor, Distributee, Heir and/or Representative of the Estate of Delbert D. York, deceased and others
Darvell York v. USA
as 11-3053
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARVELL D. YORK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
York v. Chestnut et al
as 3:2010cv00920
Plaintiff:
Herbert D. York
Defendant:
Felicia D. Chestnut, P. H. Christin, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RES-GA Gwinnett, LLC v. Presidio Management Group, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02777
Plaintiff:
RES-GA Gwinnett, LLC
Defendant:
Presidio Management Group, LLC and Jeremy D. York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
York v. Miller-Stout
as 3:2009cv05513
Petitioner:
Richard D York
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
York v. USA et al
as 5:2008cv00455
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Defendant:
USA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
York v. Veolia ES Special Services, Inc.
as 6:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Robert D. York
Defendant:
Veolia ES Special Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
York v. USA
as 5:2007cv90001
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Petitioner:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
