Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Miller v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02005
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GARY v. BAUDER et al
as 2:2016cv02861
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE GARY
Defendant:
BAUDER, COLLINS, ZAMOSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agostino et al v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00725
Plaintiff:
Cosmo G. Agostino , Joanne M. Agostino , Tina M. MacKenzie and others
Defendant:
Fulton Bank, National Association , Riverview Bank and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. TWISS TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01782
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE D. MILLER and MARGARET MILLER
Defendant:
TWISS TRANSPORTATION, INC. , TWISS TRANSPORT, INC. , TWISS LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Holt et al
as 3:2013cv01086
Plaintiff:
Harold Jerome Thornton
Defendant:
Ronnie R. Holt, Legett Bey Edward, D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHESNUT v. CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03166
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHESNUT
Defendant:
CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION and ROBERT D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv02612
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. MILLER and MARIE D. MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. MAXON LIFT CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D. MILLER and RHONDA MILLER
Defendant:
MAXON LIFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
