Cases
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
KINDLER et al v. RUSTIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00594
Plaintiff: JOHN D. KINDLER and SANDRA ALUISE
Defendant: RAMON C. RUSTIN, DANA PHILLIPS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOOKS v. RUSTIN et al
as 2:2008cv00542
Plaintiff: ISAIAH TOOKS
Defendant: RAMON RUSTIN, DANA PHILLIPS and PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYDAK v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01329
Plaintiff: KEITH MAYDAK
Defendant: COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., RAMON RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01328
Plaintiff: JAMES A. THOMAS
Defendant: COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., RAMON RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUGH v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01327
Plaintiff: DON RAOUL HOUGH
Defendant: COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., RAMON RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01012
Plaintiff: LEONARD T. WILLIAMSON, SR.
Defendant: ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DANA PHILLIPS, PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OSTEEN v. WARDEN RUSTIN et al
as 2:2007cv00035
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. & DIRECTOR DR. BRUCE DIXON, HEAD NURSE JANE DOE, WARDEN RUSTIN and others
Plaintiff: PATRICIA L. OSTEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?