Cases 31 - 35 of 35
In re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2012md02326
Plaintiff:
Brenda Moyer (WVSD CA 2:11-0810) , Jason Moyer (WVSD CA 2:11-0810) , Nicole Preston (WVSD CA 2:12-0263) and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , C. R. Bard, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell et al v. Boston Scientific Corp
as 3:2011cv01876
Plaintiff:
Amanda Powell and Daniel Powell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crespo et al v. County of Monroe, New York et al
as 6:2010cv06590
Plaintiff:
John A. Crespo, Jr. , Michael J. Aquilina , Mary Ann Auckland and others
Defendant:
County of Monroe, New York, Monroe County Sheriff's Department and Patrick M. O'Flynn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity et al v. Alamo Construction et al
as 1:2007cv06426
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity, Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity, Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Alamo Construction, Alamo Excavation and Daniel Powell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Powell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv07586
Plaintiff:
Daniel Powell
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and George R. Vierno Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
