Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center, et al.
as 24-4372
Defendant:
WELL PATH DIRECTOR, OVIEDO, Detention Commander, Monroe Detention Center, MONROE DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BENNETT
Bennett v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-4323
Plaintiff:
DAVID BENNETT
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, TIFFANY HANSEN, Director, COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Bennett v. Gocke et al
as 2:2024cv01776
Defendant:
Wenneker, Willis, Elray Henry and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cronan v. The State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers, Rep Terri Cortvriend and others
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner:
DAVID BENNETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
(PC) Bennett v. FBI, et al
as 2:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Willis, Henrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
(PC) Bennett v. Via Path Technologies et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Via Path Technologies, TouchPayonline.com, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
