Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Pierce v. Shroff et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Thomas Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Subolt Shroff, Corizon LLC, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv02719
Plaintiff:
Dianne Fleming
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Howard v. Burwell
as 4:2014cv02369
Plaintiff:
E Dianne Howard
Defendant:
Sylvia Burwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. McClintock et al
as 2:2014mc00040
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Billy Wayne McClintock, Dianne Alexander, MSC Holdings USA LLC and others
Receiver:
Jason L Nohr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Romero v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2013cv08113
Plaintiff:
DiAnn Romero
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Donahue et al
as 2:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Dianne Donahue, Maria Behavente, Jorge Behavente and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Barker v. Scottsdale, City of
as 2:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dianne Barker
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Anthony et al
as 2:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Chuck Lee
Defendant:
Kellie Dianne Anthony and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00875
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Bosch v. BCD Travel USA LLC
as 2:2012cv01875
Plaintiff:
Dianne Bosch
Defendant:
BCD Travel USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
