Cases 31 - 40 of 192
Financial Resources Federal Credit Unit v. Diebold Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Financial Resources Federal Credit Unit
Defendant:
Brinks Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Loomis Armored, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Kemper et al
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
C ODonnell, Brad Hompe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. DIEBOLD NIXDORF INC
as 4:2020cv00524
Defendant:
DIEBOLD NIXDORF INC
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HILL and ROBERT HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nautilus Hyosung Inc. v. Diebold Incorporated
as 20-2310
Defendant:
DIEBOLD INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
DIEBOLD NIXDORF INCORPORATED, fka Diebold Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HYOSUNG TNS INC., fka Nautilis Hyosung Inc.
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS HYOSUNG INC.
ROLLER et al v. DIEBOLD NIXBORF INC et al
as 3:2020cv05564
Plaintiff:
SHELBY N ROLLER and BRANDON P ROLLER
Defendant:
JOSEPH B. HYCHE and DIEBOLD NIXDORF INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROLLER et al v. DIEBOLD NIXBORF INC et al
as 1:2020cv00140
Defendant:
Joseph B. Hyche, Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. and DIEBOLD NIXDORF INC
Plaintiff:
Shelby N Roller, Brandon P. Roller and BRANDON P ROLLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DIEBOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12105
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DIEBOLD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated v. QSI, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01135
Defendant:
QSI, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINANCIAL RESOURCES FEDERAL CREDIT UNIT v. DIEBOLD INC. et al
as 3:2020cv06180
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL RESOURCES FEDERAL CREDIT UNIT
Defendant:
BRINKS COMPANY, ALLOYA CORPORATE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, LOOMIS ARMORED, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
