Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Dailey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00793
Plaintiff:
Philip Dailey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Siemens Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02051
Plaintiff:
Belinda Allen , Viola Bonner , Charece Bradley and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dailey v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Dailey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hanover Insurance Company, The v. Dailey et al
as 2:2014cv02288
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Joey Dailey, Kelly Dailey and James Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dailey v. Hands
as 1:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
Deloris Dailey
Defendant:
Sylvia Hands, Linda Rowell and Sue Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams, et al. v. Ambassador Personnel, Inc., et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adams , Billy Andrews , Quincy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ambassador Personnel, Inc. , Ambassador Personnel of Alabama, Inc. and Guyoung Tech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dailey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Carl Labarron Dailey
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2014cv00418
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jermaine Dailey
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
