Cases 31 - 40 of 10,480
Balderas v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Balderas, Jr.
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Carlos Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cazares et al v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Javier Cazares, Santa Gloria Cazares, Kimberly Garcia and others
Defendant:
Juan Maldonado, Crimson Elizondo, Richard Bogdanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
POWELL et al v. STATE FARM LLOYDS
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. POWELL and LUCRETIA A POWELL
Defendant:
STATE FARM LLOYDS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheeds v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
James David Sheeds
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
David C. Florance
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harrell v. Webtpa Employer Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
David Harrell
Defendant:
Webtpa Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
