Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Davis v. Bausch et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Kim Bausch, Chad Page and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atencio, et al. v. City of Nampa, et al.
as 1:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
A. M., Amanda Renee Atencio, I. M. and others
Defendant:
City of Nampa, Canyon County, Joe Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Warden Davis
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
John Lee
Respondent:
Warden Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dicke v. Canyon County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Lynn Dicke
Defendant:
Canyon County, Judge Davis Vandervelde, Canyon County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Atencio et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Director Atencio, Director Tewalt, Deputy Director Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shunn v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
Davis and Wesseler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. IDOC move coordinator et al
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
IDOC move coordinator, Jay Christianson, Tyrell Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Robert P. McDaniel
Defendant:
Warden Ty Davis, NP Selah Worley, Corizon Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. McKinley, et al.
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
James McKinley, James Boparao, Quintin Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Richerson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessels, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
