Cases 31 - 40 of 3,245
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taylor et al v. Hooven et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brendon Taylor and Holly Hooven
Defendant:
Jesse Lee Anthony Hooven, City Of Cincinnati, Madison M Paul and others
Wenig v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jay Allan Wenig
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nulph v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Nulph
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Walmart Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Wolfe v. Hocking County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wolfe
Defendant:
Hocking County Sheriff's Department, Chief Deputy Caleb Moritz, Deputy Craig Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
