Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Khanh Cao v. Don Taylor
as 2:2002cv02076
Petitioner:
Khanh Cao
Unknown:
Dean D Pregerson
Respondent:
Don Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Henderson v. G Schoville, et al
as 2:2000cv12616
Defendant:
P A Collier, E Comstock, Linda L Melching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Wright v. Don Taylor, et al
as 09-56911
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
DON TAYLOR and JERRY BROWN
Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C. v. North American Peruvian Horse Association et al
as 2:2009cv04511
Plaintiff:
Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C., Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C. and Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C.
Defendant:
North American Peruvian Horse Association, Barbara Windom, Donna J. Bearer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Type:
Other Statutes
Barker et al v Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2008cv06528
Plaintiff:
Roger Barker, Roger Barker, Roger Barker and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic International Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Hulen Harrell v. Don Taylor, et al
as 09-15059
Petitioner - Appellant:
HULEN T. HARRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DON TAYLOR, IRONWOOD STATE PRISON and DIANE BUTLER
Barker et al v Medtronic, Inc.
as 3:2008cv05120
Plaintiff:
Roger Barker, Roger Barker, Roger Barker and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic International Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Darryl Nedds v. John Marshall
as 08-56520
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL D. NEDDS
Respondent - Appellee:
ART CALDERON, Warden, substituted for Don Taylor
USA v. Ferrell et al
as 1:2007cv01019
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Fern Ferrell, Allen Ferrell, Charles Daren Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
