Cases 31 - 40 of 646
Vasquez v HRS Property Management, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Vasquez
Defendant:
HRS Property Management, LLC, Elite Workshop, Inc. and Houston Durand
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
DURAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20470
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DURAND, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DURAND-MCDONNELL v. EDGECOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
ELI DURAND-MCDONNELL
Defendant:
KEVIN EDGECOMB and NATHAN FORMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberto Durand v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 23-15917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MARTIN, HANF and others
Chapman v. Karp
as 23-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Roberto Durand v. Moderna TX.com/patents, et al
as 23-15871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND, Clerk shall return any filing submitted to this Court, captioned for USCA & no further docs to be filed in this closed case per ECF No. 25; For USCA see ECF No. 28
Defendant / Appellee:
MODERNA TX.COM/PATENTS, COVID 19 VACCINE EUA and HRSA.GOV/CICP
Roberto Durand v. K Caldwell
as 23-15867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND, No other documents may be filed in this now-closed case., ECF No. 7
Defendant / Appellee:
K CALDWELL
Roberto Durand v. T Cooke
as 23-15845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND, No other documents may be filed in this now closed case, ECF No. 7
Defendant / Appellee:
T COOKE
Roberto Durand v. Ruebuart, et al
as 23-15844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND, No other documents may be filed in this closed case, ECF No 35
Defendant / Appellee:
RUEBUART, STOLKS, RIGNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
