Cases 31 - 40 of 1,049
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nicole Watson and Edward Watson
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Edward Adams
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
John Edwards James, III
Respondent:
Christopher Nanos and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rasmussen v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edward Rasmussen
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Penitentiary, Tucson, C Newland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. McMorris
as 2:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edward Rodriguez
Defendant:
Skylar McMorris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younan #173538 v. Hetrick
as 2:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
Stewart Edward Younan
Defendant:
Unknown Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. TBN et al
as 2:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
TBN and American Bible Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
