Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Elliot v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00304
Plaintiff: Victoria Sue Elliot
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SYKES v. ELLIOT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00185
Defendant: CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE OF BOP, MR. ELLIOT, WARDEN KASNER and others
Plaintiff: MARRICCO A. SYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICCO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv00135
Petitioner: WENDELL ELLIOT RICCO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01357
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv01144
Plaintiff: JACKIE S. BROWN
Defendant: DELAWARE COUNTY, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRIAN ELLIOT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent: TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
UNDERWOOD v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00043
Plaintiff: GARY WILLIAM UNDERWOOD
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GUM v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00190
Plaintiff: STEPHEN M. GUM, JR.
Defendant: DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bryant v. Himelick et al
as 1:2007cv00016
Plaintiff: Michael D Bryant
Defendant: Darryll Lee Himelick, Sugar, Hoslizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?