Cases 31 - 40 of 89
McGucken v. Displate Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive and Displate Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elliot McGucken
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Elliot et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Defendant:
Accupac, Inc. and Thomas Elliot
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tawe v. Roesler et al
as 4:2017cv03436
Plaintiff:
Richard N Tawe
Defendant:
Michael A Roesler, Charles H Landis, Keith Gorsuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Weeks et al
as 1:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
John Weeks, Shane Deal, Marsha Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Myart v. Warrick, et al
as 5:2017cv00063
Defendant:
Officer Michael Baggett, Officer Ashlea Bruster, Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Elliot et al v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
as 1:2016mc01068
Plaintiff:
Chris Elliot, Raymond Genta, Kenly Hunter and others
Respondent:
Chris Elliot
Defendant:
Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Movant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Myart v. Taylor et al
as 5:2016cv00736
Defendant:
Mary Divine, Bonnie Prosser Elder, Troy Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
