Cases 31 - 40 of 366
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cohns v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gordon D'Andre Cohns
Defendant:
John Wilcher, Charles V. Loncon and Chester A. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casper v. Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ellis Casper
Defendant:
Carl Jackson, Stephen Walkowiak, Walker Bramblett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter v. Johnson et al
as 6:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Defendant:
Unit Manager Javaka Johnson, Warden Trevonza Bobbit and CO II Latoya Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Ellis and Charlotte Ellis
Defendant:
United States of America and The Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ELLIS v. DOE
as 1:2021cv02289
Defendant:
Edward Norton, DR WAYNE LEE WARREN, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L ELLIS, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Newton County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2021cv02086
Defendant:
Melvin Chambers, Newton County Sheriff Office, Sergeant Novel Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Main Street America Assurance Company v. Group Seven Sixteen, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01848
Plaintiff:
Main Street America Assurance Company
Defendant:
Digital Mammography Specialists - Eagles Landing, LLC, Rajashakher P. Reddy, M.D., Group Seven Sixteen, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
