Cases 31 - 40 of 282
Trevino v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe and FNU LNU (5:24-CV-88)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. LNU 5:24-CV-079
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Cordova
Defendant:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-079
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU LNU, FNU Rodwag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett et al v. LNU et al
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett, Laron Wood, Herre Davis and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, TDC Corporation, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rehart v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven G Rehart
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Officer K Smith, FNU LNU #1 6:24-CV-011 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LNU v. Ellis County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
FNU LNU 3:24-cv-086 and Demas Green
Respondent:
Ellis County Sheriff, Ellis County Sheriff's Office, Ellis County Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz v. Barber et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Mary Muniz
Defendant:
John Barber and FNU LNU 5:24-CV-26 (1)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz v. Hendrix et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Mary Muniz
Defendant:
FNU Hendrix, Lubbock County Detention Center and FNU LNU 5:24-CV-027 (1)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
