Cases 31 - 40 of 1,065
Apkaki v. Proguard Protection Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Frederick Apkaki
Defendant:
Proguard Protection Inc., Robert Hall and Richard Stanley
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whelan, Jr. et al v. Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Frederick F Whelan, Jr., Douglas R Emerick and Jason Albert
Defendant:
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. U.S.A.
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Frederick
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Frederick William Lore, Jr.
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and StateFarm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gaumer v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gaumer
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kindell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Kindell, Sean Scaggs, Milton Hammon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
