Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GARTZKE v. FRY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05494
Plaintiff:
RONALD ERIC GARTZKE
Defendant:
FRY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DAVID HEISTER, BARRY FAILOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fry v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Wayne E. Fry
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
OSEI v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2014cv03414
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSEI
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY , JOHN A. FRY , ROSE MARTINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLINSON v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv03260
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MARK RAWLINSON
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 3:2013cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00318
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, STAFF AND GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRY et al v. THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2012cv04914
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. FRY and ELEANOR H. FRY
Defendant:
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLT , RAY PINNEY , RANDALL BEISLER and others
Receiver:
JACQUELINE SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
