Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Gould, Jr. v. Clark, et al.
as 2:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Justin Clark, Nicholas Todd Wardrip and Francisco Carrillo
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Gould, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ANDRADE CAMARENA et al v. B & H FARM et al
as 4:2019cv00074
Defendant:
JESUS ALEJANDRO, WILLIAM J. OESTERLING, BETH OESTERLING and others
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO VALDIVIA PADILLA, VICTOR FERNANDO ANDRADE CAMARENA, FRANCISCO RAUL RODRIGUEZ SARAGOZA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
GUERRERO v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00029
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GUERRERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
VEGA CRUZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03788
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VEGA CRUZ and SAMANTHA VEGA CRUZ
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delao v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00746
Petitioner:
Francisco Delao
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALVAREZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv01706
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ALVAREZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALDERON-ACEVEDO v. QUINTANA et al
as 1:2016cv01422
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUNCANSON v. WINE AND CANVAS IP HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
MEGAN AROON DUNCANSON
Defendant:
TAMRA MCCRACKEN, ANTHONY SCOTT, WINE AND CANVAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
