Cases 31 - 39 of 39
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. CASTILLO et al
as 2:2011cv07038
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
FRANCISCO CASTILLO, CARMEN CASTILLO and CASTILLOS AND CASTILLOS INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
USA v. Francisco Castillo
as 11-2792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CASTILLO, also known as MINI
USA v. Oscar Edgardo-Guillen
as 11-50256
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OSCAR EDGARDO-GUILLEN, also known as Cabo, also known as Jose Francisco Castillo, also known as Jose Francisco Castellon
Hernandez et al v. Creative Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02132
Plaintiff:
Ismael Amparan-Cobos, Jesus Anchondo, Octavio Anchondo and others
909) 622-1851 (fax:
Creative Concepts, Inc., John Speidel and Speidel Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
NPL Construction Co., Northern Pipeline Construction Co. and Paul Schelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
USA v. Raul Castillo-Rodriguez
as 10-51067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL FRANCISCO CASTILLO-RODRIGUEZ
Castillo et al v. Building Cleaning Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03194
Plaintiff:
Francisco Castillo and Jorge Castillo
Defendant:
Building Cleaning Solutions, Inc. and Aaron Hudson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Castillo v USA
as 4:2010cv00390
Petitioner:
Francisco Castillo
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
The Dow Chemical Company v. Estanilao Caballero, et al
as 09-80037
Petitioner:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Respondent:
ESTANILAO CABALLERO, EMILIO CABALLERO CARPINTERO, ROSA ELVIRA CABALLERO CASTILLO and others
USA v. Zapata
as 08-20636
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CASTILLO ZAPATA, also known as Francisco Castillo, also known as Francisco Castillo-Zapata
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
