Cases 31 - 40 of 52
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E. FINCH, SCOTT A. RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Franklin County et al
as 2:2015cv02620
Plaintiff:
Lametra Phillips and Marcus Ramos
Defendant:
Franklin County and Franklin County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Franklin County et al
as 4:2015cv01364
Plaintiff:
Lametra Phillips and Marcus Ramos
Defendant:
Franklin County and Franklin County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 1:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 2:2014cv07024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant:
DANIEL DYE, CMNWLTH OF PA - PA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTUS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01631
Plaintiff:
R LOTUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MONICA GREER JUSTICE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Lavigne v. Franklin County Court, et al
as 14-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY A. LAVIGNE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT, DONALD H. MARDEN, VICKI HARDY and others
Smith v. DeWine et al
as 2:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Julie Smith
Defendant:
Mike DeWine , Rexann Marie Hosafros , Elizabeth Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVIGNE v. FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY A LAVIGNE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT , DONALD MARDEN , VICKI HARDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Evans v. Richard Cordray, et al
as 12-3493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES R. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. CORDRAY, FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, OHIO and MIKE DEWINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
