Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Burke v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08160
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Parties, Trinity Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
William C Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Young v. New Castle Correctional Facili, et al
as 20-1794
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID YOUNG
Valdez v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv08062
Defendant:
Unknown Chiu, Unknown Arredondo, Calvin Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Struck, Love, Bojanowski & Acedo PLC et al
as 3:2020cv08043
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Moore
Defendant:
Struck, Love, Bojanowski & Acedo PLC, Blair Hartwell Moses, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv08038
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Flemming, Unknown Coday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ben Thompson v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 19-31022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEN THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED
Morehead v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv08337
Defendant:
S Arrendondo, C Hinds, A Reichow and others
Plaintiff:
William Edward Morehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv08275
Defendant:
Unknown Nolthing, Unknown Johnston, Unknown Magno and others
Plaintiff:
J.T. Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv08180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04445
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Perry Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
