Cases 31 - 40 of 361
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01025
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Schmuhl v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00375
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Andrew Gilbert Schmuhl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Herlinger, Dean Barr, Peter M. McCrary and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 7:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Dr Mullins, Muckduff, C/O Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge St. Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge St. Prison, C.O. Johnsin and C.O. Kennety
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Muckduff, CO Johnson, Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Mickduff, Mark Andersham and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00879
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
