Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Phillip B. Gunn v. State of California
as 2:2020cv00349
Defendant:
State of California
Plaintiff:
Phillip B Gunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Penunuri v. Davis et al
as 5:2019cv06112
Defendant:
D. Smith, Ron Davis, L. Gunn and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Penunuri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Gunn v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Defendant:
Butte County Sheriff's Department, Kory Honea, Michael Ramsey and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Gunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ian LaMonte Cormier v. Riverside County District Attorney Office
as 5:2019cv01151
Defendant:
Greg Comings, Leon, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ian LaMonte Cormier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01578
Plaintiff:
Tommy J. Gunn and Shari L. Gunn
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce Mack et al v. The State of California et al
as 5:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff Department, Riverside County District Attorney Office, for the County of Riverside, Frederick Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Mack and Jamie Yvonne Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn Pacific Reflection LLC v. Asbjorn Johnsen et al
as 2:2018cv06842
Defendant:
Captains Adjusting Services, Inc., Magone Marine Service, Inc., North Sea Refrigeration Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gunn Pacific Reflection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Westwood Vistas et al
as 2:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lynn Smith and Glenn Ford Deary, II
Defendant:
Westwood Vistas, FPI Management, Ashley Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
