Cases 31 - 40 of 66
RAMBERT v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, C. CARTER, D. DICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longenberger v. Miner et al
as 4:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Sara Longenberger
Defendant:
William Miner, Darwin Tobias, III, City of Shamokin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC v. HAYES
as 2:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC
Defendant:
BAXTER MCLINDON HAYES, JR. and UTILPATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
BAXTER MCLINDON HAYES, JR. and UTILPATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LAU et al
as 2:2016cv05665
Plaintiff:
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN E. LAU , FRANK DELUCA , EDWARD KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Defendant:
CARTER, HACHERL, HAGGERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rhonshawn Jackson
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, Wetzel, Foulds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASKEY v. HAGGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
MARLENE D. ASKEY
Defendant:
HAGGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC and ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, J.A. HORTON, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, DANIEL P. BURNS, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
