Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Hardy v. SDM Hospitality LLC
as 3:2020cv03157
Defendant:
SDM Hospitality LLC
Plaintiff:
Marshall Hardy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandenburg v. John K. Hardy, OD, P.A.
as 5:2020cv01202
Plaintiff:
Martha Brandenburg
Defendant:
John K. Hardy, OD, P.A. d/b/a Hill Country Eye Associates, John K. Hardy and John K. Hardy, OD, P.A. doing business as Hill Country Eye Associates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Hardy et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Plaintiff:
Derrell McNeil Johnson
Defendant:
Corey Montres Hardy and Hardy Enterprise Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Gibbs et al
as 9:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Delinda Gibbs, Pat Hardy and Lucas Babins
Plaintiff:
Blaze Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Yates et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Timothy Yates, FNU Granthom, Hardy L Wilkerson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Christian, et al
as 4:2019cv04757
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, Wayne Christian, David A Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Perry
Interested Party:
Larry Johnson, LaToya Thorne, Taurus K. Dearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00214
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lee Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hardy Realty Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan v. American Strategic Insurance Corporation
as 2:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
Hardy Realty Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
