Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Hawkins v. Middle Tennessee Pizza, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00266
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, Doe Corporation 1-10, Middle Tennessee Pizza, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hickey v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Sergeant Dickey, Chief Bollenburg, Counselor Cude and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Sergeant Dickey, Chief Bollenburg, Counselor Cude and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Boileau et al v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Sarah O'Connell, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Thomas Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tangredi Boileau and Kyle Joseph Boileau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Warden Raymond Byrd, Vincent Vantell, Sgt. f/n/u Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Polk County, Tennessee, Hamilton County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Accord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02067
Petitioner:
Antonio Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hawkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2020cv00313
Plaintiff:
Shakira Hawkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hawkins v. Garney Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00408
Plaintiff:
Ramar I. Hawkins
Defendant:
Garney Holding Company and Garney Companies, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
