Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Bullocks v. Mayland Heights Police Department
as 4:2012cv02401
Plaintiff:
Craig Bullocks
Defendant:
Maryland Heights Police Department, Jamison White, Sandy Vanderheck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pernell v. City of Bel-Ridge et al
as 4:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Rolando D. Pernell, II
Defendant:
City of Bel-Ridge, City of Beverly Hills, City of Berkely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Maryland Heights et al v. TracFone Wireless, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00755
Plaintiff:
City of Maryland Heights and City of Winchester
Defendant:
TracFone Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comstock v. Harrah's Maryland Heights, LLC
as 4:2011cv01938
Plaintiff:
Patricia Comstock
Defendant:
Harrah's Maryland Heights, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Heights Finance Corporation
as 6:2011cv03410
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas
Defendant:
Heights Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmi v. U.S. Government et al
as 4:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Michael Carmi
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Eastern District of Missouri, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rostrum et al v. Harrah's Maryland Heights, LLC
as 4:2010cv01816
Defendant:
Harrah's Maryland Heights, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dena Rostrum and Sam Rostrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daughtery v. The Heights et al
as 4:2010cv00942
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Daughtery
Defendant:
The Heights, Cassie Dauer, Mary Siler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
