Cases 31 - 40 of 544
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MADDY et al
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MADDY, PEACH, ERIC HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BYRD, M.D. et al
as 1:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, M.D. and LAUREN CUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harber et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harber, Nicholas Irvin, Stephen Looney and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SJC Coroner Patricia Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ELLIS, WARDEN, BUILDING LIEUTENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
