Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Holland v. Antonelli
as 5:2018cv02951
Petitioner:
Michael D Holland
Respondent:
Warden Bryon M Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Koon v. Clark et al
as 4:2018cv01584
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon
Defendant:
Timothy Clark, Jordan Williams, S.C.D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Stirling et al
as 0:2017cv03286
Petitioner:
Lemond C. Holland
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Scott Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2017cv01125
Petitioner:
Deontre Devyon Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and J G Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. Holland et al
as 0:2016cv03090
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Dixon
Defendant:
Jessica E. Holland and Bryson J. Barrowclough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. United States of America et al
as 0:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Hudson, Amy Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADESSO Homeowners Association et al v. Holder Properties Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00710
Defendant:
Winston Steel LLC, Ace Glass Company Inc, Hester Drywall Inc and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Capital Group, LLC and Benito Galicia
Plaintiff:
ADESSO Homeowners Association, Emad Tadros, Sam Vause, Jr and others
Cross Defendant:
Will Whitaker
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Commercial Building Services Inc and Artistic Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bells v. Holland
as 0:2015cv04328
Petitioner:
Charlie Bells, Jr
Respondent:
James C Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
