Cases 31 - 40 of 219
STRONG v. HAMMOND
as 2:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STRONG
Defendant:
B. HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ascension Providence et al v. Becerra
as 2:2021cv00369
Plaintiff:
ASCENSION PROVIDENCE, ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL-SOUTHFIELD CAMPUS, ASCENSION SAINT JOHN HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Temores v. City of Hammond et al
as 2:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Antonio Temores
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Chief of Police William Short, Officer D A Hornyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond One LLC v. BP Products North America Inc.
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Hammond One LLC
Defendant:
BP Products North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammons v. Carroll
as 2:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Hammond and Donald Hammons
Defendant:
Shayne K. Carroll and Shayne Carrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINDOM v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
AARON D. WINDOM
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indiana Land Trust #3082 et al v. Hammond Redevelopment Commission et al
as 2:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Haitham Abuzir, Omar Abuzir, Indiana Land Trust #3082 and others
Defendant:
Thomas McDermott, Jr, Dawn Tomich, Hammond Redevelopment Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
