Cases 31 - 40 of 362
Smith #267009 et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith, Chauvez Chavez, J.B. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc, Microsoft LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly #225090 v. Corizon of Michigan et al
as 1:2023cv00067
Defendant:
Corizon of Michigan, Corizon Health, Inc., Wellpath Now of Michigan and others
Plaintiff:
Opelton Kelly #225090
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes et al v. Wright & Filippis, LLC
as 2:2023cv10438
Plaintiff:
Brooke Hayes and Heather Randall
Defendant:
Wright & Filippis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pittman #364680 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward Peblo Pittman #364680
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Bowne, C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staffney v. Duncan et al
as 5:2022cv12990
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
N. Duncan, Brenda Buchanan, Danya Russo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Kelly v. Corizon of Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv10070
Defendant:
Corizon of Michigan, Corizon Health Inc., Wellpath Now of Michigan and others
Plaintiff:
Opelton Kelly
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kerchen et al v. University of Michigan et al
as 4:2022cv12492
Defendant:
University of Michigan, James H Woods, Christian Raphalides and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Kerchen, Lori Kerchen and Dale Kerchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
