Cases 31 - 40 of 504
HITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21269
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PHILLIP HITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
New Hope Wesleyan Church v. Ecclesia Construction Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
New Hope Wesleyan Church
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Ecclesia Construction Company, LLC doing business as Ecclesia Building Strategies
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ironhidez Construction, LLC, Chief Industries, Inc. doing business as Chief Buildings, Hite Architecture, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17166
Plaintiff:
ERIK HITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hite et al v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hite and Dianna Hite
Defendant:
USA and Valerie Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12187
Plaintiff:
STACEY HITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shambaugh & Son, L.P. v. Reichhart et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Shambaugh & Son, L.P.
Defendant:
Matthew Reichhart, Eric Hite and Bobby Elliott
Hite et al v. USA
as 3:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hite and Dianna Hite
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08418
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL HITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00636
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
