Cases 31 - 40 of 373
HOLMES v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HOLMES
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERMAN v. MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., W ALEXANDER HOLMES, ANTONIO O GARZA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RUFF v. RESONANT INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
BENNY RUFF
Defendant:
RESONANT INC., GEORGE B HOLMES, MICHAEL FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Holmes v. Harper et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER and MICHAEL VEITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01455
Plaintiff:
Angela Holmes
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv04115
Petitioner:
JOSEPH HOLMES
Respondent:
D.B. OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. American Home Patient/Lincare
as 4:2021cv01683
Plaintiff:
Patricia Holmes
Defendant:
American Home Patient/Lincare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
