Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Rosenow v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosenow, Jr.
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and T. Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Horn v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv01429
Plaintiff:
Bobby Daryl Horn
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, John Hutton, Rutledge and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00258
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Horn v. Riverview Towers Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
Zanathious Zane Horn
Defendant:
Riverview Towers Inc. and Peggy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01348
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Horne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Horne v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01349
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Horne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00252
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Horn v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2011cv03526
Plaintiff:
Roberta Jane Horn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
