Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Hull v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01553
Plaintiff:
Dillina N. Hull
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hull v. Berryhill
as 4:2018mc01205
Plaintiff:
Dillina N. Hull
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Application for IFP
Hull et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00335
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hull and Jeffrey Hull
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marrico Spears v. City of North Richland Hills Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00081
Defendant:
City of North Richland Hills Texas, City of Fort Worth, A J Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Marrico Edward Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hull v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02100
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Hull
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $326,800.00 in United States currency et al
as 4:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$326,800.00 in United States currency, $13,773.09 from Bank of America account x1630, $11,100.00 from J.P. Morgan Chase account x1747 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Liu v. Flowers Davis, PLLC et al
as 4:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Hao Liu
Defendant:
Flowers Davis, PLLC , Harrison & Hull, LLP , Sulphur Springs City of and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hull v. The State Of Texas
as 4:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leslie Hull
Defendant:
The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hull v. Everette et al
as 1:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Travis Clint Hull
Respondent:
Tony Everette, Amie Taft, Shawna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
