Cases 31 - 40 of 297
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20143
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv19307
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2019cv01169
Respondent:
ASIA YOUNG, DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lindell, Nate v. Novak, Sue et al
as 3:2019cv00626
Defendant:
C.O. Nick Pesavento, Sue Novak, I.C.E. Michael Glass and others
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01237
Defendant:
Asia Young, Warden Orlando Harper, Caitlyn Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Maya v. Department of Homeland Sec., et al
as 19-12363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MAYA
Defendant / Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.), SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00896
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hoskins, Michael v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2019cv00293
Defendant:
I.C.E. T. Moon, Capt. Rymarkiewicz, Warden Brian Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Sheriff of Palm Beach County and Immigration et al
as 9:2019cv80510
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.), Ric Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Denilson Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01054
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
