Cases 31 - 40 of 162
HUFF v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2021cv00727
Defendant:
BIERMAN, ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and INIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
JUVONTE T HUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INIGUEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv06228
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER INIGUEZ
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Cruz Iniguez
as 21-50050
Defendant / Appellant:
CRUZ INIGUEZ, AKA Cruz Iniguez Garcia, AKA Gruz Garcia Iniguez, AKA Manuel Martinez, AKA Seal A
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wyche v. Iniguez
as 4:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Milo Iniguez
Plaintiff:
Derek Wyche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Alston, Jr. v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 21-15325
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, MADRIAGO, Deputy, #1337, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, Jr.
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Shelley Iniguez
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Shelley Iniguez
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera v. The Los Angeles Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2020cv09443
Defendant:
ACLU, Deputy Bassett, Joseph Iniguez and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INIGUEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12375
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA INIGUEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Smith v. Insurer of CDC et al
as 1:2020cv01196
Defendant:
M. Iniguez, Insurer of CDC, C. Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jamaar Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
