Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court, Superior Court of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Congress
as 22-15439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CONGRESS
Murphy-Richardson v. Congress
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15179
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 22-15001
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Respondent:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 22-15000
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Respondent:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09970
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
as 21-16804
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
