Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Miller v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Derrick Earl Miller
Defendant:
J. E. Thomas, F. Entzel, Michael D. Tafelski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv02348
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BEARAM v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEARAM
Defendant:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, DR. CUTLER, J. HUBLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COUGHLIN et al v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
BREANNA COUGHLIN and TIMOTHY J. MILLER, SR.
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Miller v. Trans Union, LLC
as 3:2012cv01715
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Miller
Defendant:
Trans Union, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LAMPLUGH v. SUNOCO COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03966
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAMPLUGH
Defendant:
SUNOCO COMPANY, INC. , BRIAN J. MILLER , GARY A. FURTAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MILLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2012cv00976
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. MILLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michtavi v. Scism et al
as 1:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
Shemtov Michtavi
Defendant:
William Scism, J. Miller, D Spotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Eileen Miller and Paul J Miller
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh , Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. , Ryder System, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. , Ryder Public Transportation Services, Inc. , Ryder System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
